In a recent development concerning the Patanjali advertisement case, the Supreme Court of India once again heard arguments on Tuesday. During the hearing, yoga guru Baba Ramdev and his associate Acharya Balkrishna were present. Despite their submissions, the Supreme Court rejected the apology offered by Baba Ramdev on behalf of Patanjali. The court remarked that they are not inclined to forgive Ramdev at the moment, citing multiple instances of non-compliance with court orders.
Legal Battle Over Patanjali’s Alleged Claims Against Allopathic Medicines
The case revolves around advertisements by Patanjali that allegedly make claims against allopathic medicines. The bench comprising Justice Hima Kohli and Justice Amanullah Khan presided over the hearing, where Baba Ramdev and Acharya Balkrishna appeared with their lawyer, Mukul Rohatgi.
During the proceedings, the court made it clear that they have not accepted Baba Ramdev’s apology. When asked if they had anything else to submit, Patanjali’s lawyer, Mukul Rohatgi, stated that they have not filed any new documents. However, they expressed their willingness to apologize publicly for the breach of court orders. Baba Ramdev and Acharya Balkrishna stated that they are prepared to publish a public apology in newspapers for the violations.
The next hearing in the case is scheduled for April 23, where both parties will be required to appear. Justice Hima Kohli reiterated the court’s stance, reminding Baba Ramdev that they have violated court orders not once but three times. The court maintained that they are currently not inclined to grant forgiveness.
Legal Case Emphasizes Court Orders Compliance and Responsible Advertising in Healthcare
The case highlights the importance of compliance with court orders and the repercussions of non-compliance in legal proceedings. It also underscores the significance of responsible advertising practices, especially in sensitive areas like healthcare.
As the legal battle continues, it remains to be seen how Patanjali and its representatives navigate the complex terrain of legal obligations and public accountability. The outcome of the case will have implications not only for the parties involved but also for the broader regulatory framework governing advertising standards in India.