Delhi High Court Pronounces Crucial Verdict on Divorce, Allegations of Cruelty by In-Laws Accepted

During divorce proceedings, the Delhi High Court has made a significant observation, stating that excessive interference by the in-laws (husband’s family) in the relationship between the husband and wife will be considered as mental cruelty.

Delhi High Court Grants Divorce as Allegations of Cruelty by Wife’s Family are Acknowledged

In a divorce case heard by the Delhi High Court, allegations of cruelty against the wife and her family were acknowledged, leading to the approval of the divorce. The court, during the husband’s plea, asserted that the undue interference by the wife’s family constitutes mental cruelty. The petitioner claimed that the wife was unduly influenced by her family, leading to a lack of natural relations with the husband. Despite efforts to improve the relationship over 13 years of separation, the court concluded that there was no possibility of reconciliation.

The Delhi High Court, presided over by Justices Suresh Kumar Kait and Neena Bansal Krishna, highlighted that the wife’s behavior validated the husband’s allegations. The excessive interference in the husband-wife relationship by the wife’s family led to mental harassment for the husband.

The court recognized that the wife had outrightly rejected social and other responsibilities associated with marriage due to her family’s influence. Such conduct was considered mental cruelty towards the petitioner. The court, acknowledging the husband’s plea of mental cruelty, granted the divorce.

Acknowledges Irretrievable Breakdown and Ruling Emphasizes Futility of Continuing a Bitter Relationship

In this 13-year-long separation case, the Delhi High Court concluded that the relationship had irretrievably broken down. The prolonged legal battle had intensified bitterness between the parties, leaving no room for trust and love. The court’s verdict emphasizes that maintaining the relationship would result in cruelty towards both parties. The ruling reflects the court’s acknowledgment of the futility of sustaining a relationship that has lost all hope for improvement, with allegations of cruelty adding to the bitterness.